Information and Links
Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.
- Other Posts
- Next NYT Blog is Up
- Assault Rifle Flare
Email from a Journalism Grad Student
Dear Lt. Barnett:
I am an M.A. student in journalism at UW-Madison. I have read your blog and enjoyed it. I enjoy trying to understand the experience of soldiers in Iraq and your blog has helped me to do this.
I am currently researching an article for a journalism class regarding the opinion about the Iraq War of people in Wisconsin who have lost loved ones in the war. I have spoken to several parents of soldiers who were killed in Iraq.
I have noticed that these parents fall roughly into two groups: people who feel that protesting the war dishonors their sons and other soldiers; and people who have the opposite opinion. Among the former group, people have told me that they (and soldiers) feel that opposition to the war is equivalent to not supporting the troops.
I am old enough to remember what the homefront was like during the Vietnam War. In those days, some war protestors would call U.S. soldiers “baby killers,” etc. There was no attempt by many opposed to the war to distinguish between what they saw as an immoral war and moral soldiers prosecuting that war.
Looking at the mood of the homefront now, I see a radical difference. I think that people opposing the war are taking great pains to distinguish their protest style from that of the Vietnam era–i.e., not to vilify U.S. troops and in fact to try to express support for the troops. Therefore, it has been interesting to me to hear people express the idea that protest against the war negates these protestors’ good intentions. In other words, to soldiers (and families) protest equals lack of support.
Since some of my interviewees claim to be speaking on behalf of soldiers by expressing this opinion, I would like to find out whether their opinions are really shared with soldiers in Iraq.
Therefore, I would like to ask your opinion about this matter: What is your attitude (and that of other soldiers in Iraq, as far as you know) to homefront protest against the war or non-support of the war? Do you equate that to non-support of the troops? Does support of the troops require unquestioning support of the mission? How does opposition to the war at home make you and other soldiers in Iraq feel? Is it demoralizing? Does it make your job more difficult? Additionally, last week many Wisconsin counties held referenda regarding whether or not the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq? What is your opinion about this?
I know you are very busy, of course. However, I would appreciate any response you could make. I also would be delighted if you could share this e-mail with other soldiers there. I would be eager to learn the opinions of as many soldiers as possible.
Although this line of questioning is tangential to the original thrust of my research, I have discovered that journalism is like spelunking (or what I imagine spelunking to be)–one keeps encountering forks in the road of inquiry. So, it is kind of difficult at the beginning to map out where you will ultimately end up.
If you or others are able to respond, I would appreciate having the responder’s name and/or job title and general location.
Thank you very much for any response you can make.
Best wishes for your safety and success with your mission,
Kathryn
————————————————————————————
Kathryn,
Thank you for the email. I will be happy to field your questions, as this is a vastly interesting and controversial topic. I speak for myself and myself only.
What is your attitude (and that of other soldiers in Iraq, as far as you know) to homefront protest against the war or non-support of the war?
I believe free speech is a vital and healthy tenet of our society. When the drafters of the Bill of Rights sat down to make a list of things the .gov should absolutely not touch, free speech was #1. The right to keep and bear arms was #2, by the way, and I’d hate to see this country trample on the First Ammendment as it has the Second Ammendment. You can never please all of the people all the time. If you ever see that happening, you may very well be in the middle of a dictatorship, and while DougS says “there are worse things than a dictatorship,” I would certainly hate for it to be me. The bottom line is that I think it’s fine that people protest the war. I don’t happen to agree with their opinion, but part of respect is being able to disagree with someone.
Do you equate that to non-support of the troops?
I have met several people who have told me “I am against the war, but I support you.” It’s hard for me personally to wrap my mind around not supporting a war yet supporting those who execute that war, but it does appear possible. I have yet to met anyone hostile towards me or my Marines because we are warfighers. I have read their articles on blogs and in newspapers, so I know they do exist, but the vast majority of dissenters tend to carry the “I support the troops, but not the war” attitude. I think this may be a product of trend. How many protesters have the gall to actively oppose our troops when most of their peers do not? September 11th made it trendy to be a patriot, and much like everything else in American pop culture, nobody wants to get caught with their own ideas that no one else agrees with. Do I equate protesting the war with non-support of the troops? No. Do I scrutinize the motivations of war protesters and wonder what they really believe in those deep, dark places they don’t like to talk about at parties? Yes.
Does support of the troops require unquestioning support of the mission?
Nothing should ever be unquestioning. Even military orders given to us by our commanders are only to be executed if they are “lawful orders.” It’s up to the individual to determine whether an order is lawful. I think I expounded on this enough during the previous question. I think it is possible for someone to support our troops but not support their mission.
How does opposition to the war at home make you and other soldiers in Iraq feel?
I can only speak to what I think about the situation. I understand there will always be dissenting opinion to any decision made by anyone. I deal with it everyday. When someone doesn’t like one of my decisions my standard question in return is ‘OK, do you have a better idea?” My personal opinion is that opposition to the war doesn’t bother me. I think it’s naive and narrow-minded. What should we have done? Do they really want us to pack our bags and pull out tomorrow? Do they understand that will leave this job undone, for another generation. Thomas Paine once said “If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.”
Is it demoralizing?
Well, it certainly doesn’t build morale. However, I am fine with people disagreeing with me. I also don’t mind that not everyone in the world wants to be my friend. In the words of Doc Holliday: You know, if I didn’t think you were my friend, I don’t think I could bear it.
Does it make your job more difficult?
I am very separated from any protest against the war, and it is unable to affect my job. Furthermore, my wife is as resolved as I am, so I do not have to deal with any dissenting opinion on the homefront. I can pretty much deal with anything else. To let a few war protesters in the states affect the execution of my job would be lunacy, and I would consider myself weak because of it.
Additionally, last week many Wisconsin counties held referenda regarding whether or not the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq? What is your opinion about this?
My opinion? Did they also discuss corporate marketing strategies? I’m guessing Bill Gates and Steve Jobs made it a point to attend. Perhaps they have an opinion on whether I should put my left boot on first or my right? The way this system works is simple: You elect a representative that best reflects your personal values. That representative votes on your behalf. If you can’t elect a representative that shares your values you either move or accept the fact that your opinion may be in the minority. The way it DOESN’T work is by random counties in a random state holding a referenda on national military policy and thinking anyone gives two shits. Let General Pace and the rest of the Chiefs of Staff do their job. Let the Commandant do his job. They get paid plenty to do it, have been doing it for 30+ years, and are vastly more qualified than you, me, and any county commission in Wisconsin. If these county referendums would really like to do something useful perhaps they could send me some cheese. I’m a fan of smoked Gouda.
Your comparison to the Vietnam era protests is interesting. In “On Killing” Dave Grossman explores the effects of these protests in depth. He concludes that they contributed heavily to the dramatically increased numbers of PTSD that is present in Vietnam veterans. He contends that the inability of society to help these veterans cope with having to kill their fellow man caused the psychological train wrecks that are often present in veterans of that war. I am not 100% convinced of his theories, but it does present some interesting food for thought, especially for the protester who actively DOES NOT support our troops. One thing that comes to mind is the final scene in James Webb’s book “Fields of Fire” where one of the characters (I think it is Senator) gives a speech about the war and returns to find his car defaced. I am certainly laisse-fare about the war protesters, but my opinion might change if I returned to booing, spitting, and accusations. I also can’t accurately predict how I would feel if I was a parent who lost a son or daughter in the war. It might change my opinion. However, a good perspective of one’s place in the universe may also be in order. I joined the Marine Corps because I believe in values that are bigger and more important than myself. The Declaration of Independence states that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. It doesn’t state “all Americans,” but “all men” (all of humanity). Because of what we’re doing over here millions of people will now come closer to enjoying those inalienable rights that were suppressed from them for so long. I hope that if I fall my loved ones will know that my death served a greater good, and I hope they would be level-headed enough to view the issue through an untainted lens.
Well said Midnight!Take care.
Semper gratus,
Donna