Assault Rifle Flare


In the quest to continuously better our weaponry, the M16 has gone through some significant changes. The adoption of the smaller, more versatile M4 carbine as our fighting rifle it has significantly broadened the options available to the rifleman. The quad-rail system from Knight’s Armament that replaces the handguards of the M4 has added the most versatility of all, giving you endless attachment options within compact package. Ever wished you could have a flashlight attached to your weapon? Now you can. Want a vertical foregrip? No problem. Infrared laser targeting? No sweat. Because of these advances I thought it might be interesting to introduce you to my rifle and its many accoutrements. It has become a running joke that all the accessories are “pieces of flare.” The more flare you have, the better. I mean, you do want to express yourself, right?

This is my rifle...

My rifle is an M4. An M4 is basically an M16 with a shorter barrel and collapsible stock. This is a gross simplification, and there are many variations of each weapon, but I don’t think my average reader is concerned with them. As a gun nut, however, they definitely interest me, so I’ll be happy to field questions on the subject. My M4 has a flat-top receiver. This is slang for a receiver cut with a mil-standard 1913 Picatinny rail. You can mount almost anything on a Picatinny rail, which is why the handguards of the weapon have been replaced with a system of four rails.

Gadgets and Wizardry

The receiver of my rifle carries an EO Tech optical sight. The optic provides no magnification, the advantage being a larger field of view and ease of tracking moving targets. It displays a red reticle where my rounds will impact at a given range. I can adjust the brightness of this reticle for daylight or night conditions. I can also press a button and the reticle becomes infrared, and visible only through NVGs (night vision goggles). Training with this optic has shown me what a huge increase in efficiency it provides to the shooter. The most marked improvement is in target acquisition. I can put rounds on target from short range (50m and less) about three times as fast with my EO Tech as with normal iron sights, and the effect is only compounded at longer ranges. The other widely available optic is the Trijicon ACOG, a 4x optic that General Mattis has called “the greatest advancement to the infantry rifleman since the introduction of the M1 Garand (~1941).

More Wizardry

On the bottom rail of the rail system resides my vertical foregrip, or “broomstick.” The broomstick isn’t for “spraying and praying” as people use them for in movies. If used properly it allows you another option of securely holding and aiming your weapon. Taped to the broomstick are actuating sensors for the next two devices I will discuss.

Gotta Have It

On the right side of the rail system is a Surefire flashlight. If you spend any time inside houses at night, you’re going to want illumination. The lighting in Arab homes is sketchy, and doesn’t usually work in every room. The lantern that services the dark rooms may get broken during the hit. Plus, you may not want the lights on just yet. All great reasons to have your own dedicated flashlight. The Surefire is bright, blindingly bright, and will generally light up the zip code. I can simply turn the light on and leave it on, or I can use the remote pressure-activated switch that is routed to the broomstick and electrical taped to the rear side. The switch is set up so that I do not inadvertently turn on the flashlight with a normal grip on the broomstick. I simply adjust my grip a little bit clockwise and depress the switch with my fingers.

Doing Business

On top of the weapon is a gadget that always reminds me of the Starship Enterprise, the PEQ-2A. This device performs two functions: projects an infrared dot onto your target, and projects an infrared floodlight onto the area. Both are only visible with NVGs, of course. The IR dot on target is similar to the little red laser dots dancing on the target you see in movies, except it is only visible with NVGs. Furthermore, I can put different filters on the lens to make the dot different shapes. This means each member of my team can have a different shaped dot (triangle, crosshair, circle, letter “T”, etc) so we know who is pointing at what just by the look of the dot. This can be useful for pointing at things and communicating about them simultaneously on the radio. The IR floodlight is simply a flashlight that lights up the area for your NVGs. NVGs aren’t perfect; they don’t show it all. A little extra IR energy always helps to illuminate your surroundings. I have installed the remote switch for this device on the upper right side of the broomstick, which I activate with my left index finger.

Sling Attachment

Holding this mess together is a slew of electrical tape and Velcro. On the rear of the weapon I have used duct tape to reinforce my single-point sling attachment, as well as my buttstock magazine pouch. In war beauty means nothing; functionality means everything. I think that is why I am thriving so far.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Email from a Journalism Grad Student
The Simple Life

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.




Reader Comments

You said it best Jeff, it doesn’t have to look pretty as long as it does the job and keeps you guys safe right?

Just wanted to let you know that I LOVE all the pictures you post, they really give us an inside look at what you guys are facing there everyday.

Hope you and the others are feeling better and finally over whatever you had. Still keeping you in my prayers and again THANK YOU for what you do. You are truly appreciated :)
God Bless!!!

Ditto what Sandra said! Take good care…

I have found this fascinating, having always had an interest in those items in freedom’s arsenal that maintain our way of life, from aircraft to, in this case, the M4 rifle.

It is incredible what has been added to increase the basic effectiveness of this weapon, adapting it is so many ways both to you and to the circumstances you will encounter. I had studied the photos and your comments on your photostream but had some difficulty following what you were saying. With the greater depth of this post and the placement of the pictures, I have been able to understand and actually to ID that to which you are referring as you go along. I note something which may or may not be the case, but it gives the appearance of being a fairly light weapon for the versatility it provides.

In the final analysis, it is clear that this weapon and its adaptations are there to give you a superior ability when you confront the enemy. That would be exactly what I pray for you and those with whom you serve. God bless you and your marines and may you always continue to thrive.

Midnight, you are a firearms expert. Not many qualify as handgun and rifle expert.. I am very proud of you. You and your company are in our prayers.

Be SAFE

Wow, that’s incredible, Jeff! Does it shoot, too?

Heh i wish we could have all those cool attachments for the m4 in aa:o (the armys video game) but of course it wouldn’t be fair for the OpFor with their chinese made ak47’s

Yeah it is always nice toget whatever advantage you can get. Too bad we don’t have a good efp detector yet. If we ‘modify’ (which means even attach anything to) out M4’s we have to give the added stuff to the company I work for - doesn’t sound like they want us to have the advantage does it?

Barry,
That is a strange rule. Doesn’t pass the common sense test. I bet there is miscommunication somewhere between who makes the rules and the warfighters.

Web Reconnaissance for 04/10/2006…

A short recon of whatÂ’s out there that might draw your attention….

Wow! Pimp my assault weapon!

Aint no video game is it……….

Nephew Marine with amphib assault just left for the sandbox. Son’s getting ready. I hope they learn from Marines like you.

thank you
J

Thanks for the info, how much does that weapon weigh with all the accessories on it?

Do you carry back-up iron sights in case the EOTech packs up?

Do yuou carry any other weapons? I see a holster in some pictures, I assume Beretta.

Thanks for the insight.

Mik

Is it a pain to clean? I mean with all that stuff on it.

In my best estimation it probably weighs a little more than a standard M16, maybe about 9 pounds.

The areas that the accessories attach to are not real problem areas for cleaning the weapon. A shot of compressed air goes 90% of the way towards cleaning the outside of the rifle.

Yes, in addition to my M4 I carry a Beretta M9 in a thigh-rig holster. Definitely not my pistol of choice, but it’s also not that bad.

Best to you and your Marines. I just wish they didn’t make you carry that MacNamara special. It has too many birth defects to count, yet Marines will get er done no matter what they are given to fight with.

I guess we can kiss that weight advantage over say … the M1 out the window. The ole steel and iron M1 weighs 9 lbs too. No I am not a go back to the M14 kinda guy although I respect it. I just know if we started with a devastating round, then worked up a reliable accurate launcher for it, with magazines that don’t fail, we would be better off.

Any way luck always,

Semper Fi from one of them ‘old guys’

jim b,
The M1 may have weighed 9 pounds, but it carried 8 rounds of 30-06 and had none of the attachments I am discussing in this article. Stripped of its “flare” my M4 is much closer to 6.5 lbs. Let’s compare apples to apples. Before I dive into this I want to point out I am a huge fan of the M1. I think the M14 is a nice rifle, but firmly believe there are better rifles out there, and that the US made a mistake in fielding it.

I carry 240 rounds of 5.56 on my person when outside the wire in addition to 30 rounds of 9mm. How much 7.62×51 could I carry? I’ll tell you, weight is at a premium. With my flak jacket, 4 SAPI plates, neck, throat, & groin protectors, PRR radio, MBITR radio, kevlar helmet, nomex gloves, ballistic glasses, med kit, 240 rounds of 5.56, 30 rounds of 9mm, and my M9 in a thigh rig I have got to be carrying over 60 pounds. Heck, when I put this stuff on I have to throw it above my head and swing one arm into it at a time like some type of awkward power clean and jerk.

I’ll take my 9-pound M4 with all its attachments over a bare M1 or even bare M14 any day. And I’m sure you know this, but it’s prudent to point out the M14 is only around because the US was too frugal to invest in new tooling for the “other” rifle that over 90 NATO countried adopted, the FN FAL. Sure, we can make it on M1 tooling, so why choose a more ergonomic design and be standardized with all of our communist-fighting allies?

I am bored to tears with the 7.62 vs 5.56 debate. The simple fact of the matter is that rifles don’t kill people anymore, for the most part. Enemy KIA/WIA is on the order of 1 per 10,000 rounds fired. Compare that to artillery. That’s why we haven’t seen a change in the US’s standard issue rifle since the 60s, because it doesn’t pay to develop and field new rifles.

We also have 7.62 weapons in the form of our M240E/G medium machine gun. We never leave the FOB without 240s, M2s, and sometimes MK19s in the turrets of our HMMWVs. We carry plenty of firepower. There’s no need to burden me with a heavier rifle that holds fewer rounds for that once-in-a-lifetime Arab crack addict that takes 3 rounds of 5.56 and keeps coming.

If I’m in a fighting hole, give me a 7.62, preferably a FAL, or even better, something that takes links. If I’m at Camp Perry sipping coffee and discussing wind dope and boat-tail bullet design, then I’ll take an M14. If I have to move around, give me my aluminum receivered POS Stoner-designed AR/M16 variant that craps where it eats. It hasn’t failed me yet.

I am glad you are a fan of the weapon you have, and confident in it.

I am not suggesting the return to the M1, the M14, or the rounds they employ.

I am saying that the M16 series is old. I had the priviledge of my first one jamming on the third round way back in 1969.

I am suggesting that it is time for an upgrade. And the way to start is with an efficient round. We all know that the Army has been stifled due to confusion about the whole issue. Two prototypes have been up and down already. Both based on the 5.56. Some think that it is due to a feeling that basing the new weapon on an old cartridge (5.56) sunk the new prototypes. We shall see. The old M16 family is going on 40 years old, so is that cartridge. Perhaps you would not need to carry so much ammo if each round was more effective.

As for the sights and flashlights, they are an improvement.

Have you ever shot an M82 Jeff? Are they coo? I guess that is an Army weapon, but I thought sense you are a gun enthusiast you might know about it. I play Americas Army, and that gun is sweet in that game.

jim b,
Point taken. Perhaps the answer is one of the new 6.5mm cartridges that has been developed. It worked for the Swedes for quite a long time.

Slayer,
I have shot a Barrett M99, the bolt-action version of the M82. It makes a big boom. A BIG boom. Thanks to the muzzle brake, the recoil is actually manageable, about comparable to a solid 12GA buckshot or slug load. I have seen videos of snipers in Afghanistan engaging the enemy with M82s. The enemy bodies actually explode, sending arms, legs, and goo everywhere.

It appears to me the new M4 with your attached modifications will be a great tool in helping the Marines and the U.S. Army find the “doornob” and be able to head in the direction of more friendly zipcodes.

Sooner rather than later.

That video of snipers engaging targets in Iraq was actually a video of guys shooting rock chucks with some sort of high velocity varmint round. (=

I always wondered what those IR things were and how they worked. Never occurred to me the thing would have two users: flashlight and pointer.

Did you have a choice between the ACOG and the EO Tec?

Dear sir,
I just want to thank you for your service over in Iraq and sharing your photo’s with us especially the ones of your M-4. I am a prior service Marine currently in the process of applying for OCS. By reading your blog I am motivated even more to do whatever I can to make my way back in the Marines hopefully as an Officer to serve my god, my country and the Marine Corps. Maybe one day I will have the privilege of serving with you. Thank you for your time, and your service.

Semper Fidelis,

Steven Henry

nah it doesnt look the best but as long as it does the job and blows people apart thats all that mateers, lol

jim b,
The M16/M16A1 you were issued in Vietnam is but a very distant cousin of the M4 Midnight is issued. Improvements in the gas system, chamber, bolt carrier, bolt, buffer, and cartridge design have left it a most reliable and effective weapon. The most common cartridge is the M855 not the M193 you were using. However, many units (at least Army units) are starting to receive the Mk262 Mod 1 cartridge. This is a 77 gr. SMK OTM bullet travelling at was has been reported at 2650 fps from the 14.5″ barrel of the M4. It’s terminal ballistics are reported to at least as effective as the 7.62 NATO out to 150 meters. The 6.8 SPC cartridge is also in development, but it requires a new upper receiver and magazine assembly to be utilized. I’m old schoool also. I’ve fired the M14 and M16A1. The M4 weapon system is light years beyond either of them. The 7.62 NATO is still the cartridge of choice for sniper systems. But for the average Infantryman, the M4 is well suited and a proven design for his current tactical environment.

I almost forgot Midnight, why no BUIS? You could move your PEQ-2 forward and slide the EOTech forward to make room for the BUIS. Although, I also own an EOTech and I know how reliable they are, still I’m running a ARMS #40.

Karl,
I would love a BUIS, but we don’t have any. I like the ARMS #40 as well, although I think I remember preferring the price of the GG&G if I was to purchase one myself. All of the items on my M4 are issued. I am lucky to have a command that is responsive to the needs of its trigger-pullers, even though we aren’t an infantry unit.

I, too, enjoyed this post and reading about the flexibility and lethality of the great M4. My concern is that hajji now knows how to fire your weapon as well.

CJ, thanks for the opinion, but I think your concern is rather unfounded. I don’t think it’s any secret how to build, operate, troubleshoot, or accessorize a M16 variant. AR15.com has all the info one could ever need, and I am sure there were resources in place before that.

Let’s not ascribe too much importance to this blog.

That’s right, jeff ain’t no celebrity yet… But we’rewrokin on it.

Any preference - say, good ole 1911 - vs. that Beretta you’re carrying?

Did your M4 come with some kind of Tritium Front Sight Post/Rear Sight Aperture?
It doesn’t mention it on the Colt site and I had heard they didn’t have it. Just wanted to hear from someone who has one. Thanks for your service!

Really informative and interesting BLOG, Jeff, thanks for doing it. Was it scary over there? Was it super hot? It would be for me- I remember receiving my “just making sure we have your correct address” letter from Selective Service a week before the skies lit up for Desert Storm- I was thinking “oh crap, my Dad, uncles and cousins went to WWII and ‘Nam and now it’s my turn”. Boy was I glad to see that one over fairly quickly.

I’m a gun enthusiast also, I have an Armalite M15A4 SPR and I just started shooting in the practical shooting assoc. matches, fun.

Thanks for your service to our country and God Bless you and keep you safe.

One last thought- I often think of how individuals are not allowed to settle disputes by force of arms but governments are, a basic incongruity that I think contributes to violent societies.

Eventhough it is so much fun to show off weapon systems because it is just so cool, it is really not smart. You now have just explained multiple things for the whole world to read (Including hadj). Plus, nice serial number… Let us all unite and use our brains.

SpecOps,
Please enlighten me. What info did a reveal that isn’t available at ar15.com or in the online user manuals for each item I discussed (and they are all available to civilians, possibly excluding the PAQ-2A)
Also, I’ve hung out on gun forums for a long time and seen people black out their serial numbers, but nobody has ever told me a legitimate reason you wouldn’t want it known. Can you, or is that a secret as well?

I did like reading this article, the military has come along way for helping the rifleman to accesorize their weapon as needed. The only thing is that I’ve read many articles talking about how the m4 doesn’t hold up well in the desert, low tolerances or something would you consider this true or is this exaggaerated?

Type your comment here.
Nice work, if a little overloaded. I have read that the US Army is about to swith to 6.8 mm after experience in Afghanistan and Iraq showed the 5.56 mm just does not have the range and hitting power needed in the typical battlefield scenario of today. Can anyone offer any guidance here? Your rifle is downright ugly, but it is results that matter in battle, not looks. Keep up the good work.

Great briefing on the new - at least to me - M-4 Gadgets. Quick quesation. Is anyone concerned that all these attachments will snag when exiting a vehicle or in other tight quarters?

Sexy M4 you’ve got there. Only thing that would make it look better in that first pic is an M203.

I may not be there with you pulling triggers, but I’m with you in spirit, brother.

Ooh-rah!